Table 5 Comparison of NYHA cardiac function grading and CCS angina grading before and after treatment between the two groups of patients
Grading | Groups | Before treatment | Six months after treatment | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NYHA grading | Control group | 0.038 | ||
Grade II | 18(60.0%) | 22(73.3%) | ||
Grade III | 12(40.0%) | 8(26.7%) | ||
Rehabilitation group | < 0.001 | |||
Grade I | 0(0%) | 8(26.7%) | ||
Grade II | 17(56.7%) | 20(66.7%) | ||
Grade III | 13(43.3%) | 2(6.7%) | ||
CCS grading | Control group | 0.047 | ||
Grade I | 5(16.7%) | 9(30.0%) | ||
Grade II | 16(53.3%) | 17(56.7%) | ||
Grade III | 9(30.0%) | 4(13.3%) | ||
Rehabilitation group | < 0.001 | |||
Grade 0 | 0(0%) | 7(23.3%) | ||
Grade I | 6(20.0%) | 18(60.0%) | ||
Grade II | 14(46.7%) | 5(16.7%) | ||
Grade III | 10(33.3%) | 0(0%) |