Table 16 Hemodynamic parameters at the end of follow up in Inspiris Resilia versus other bioprosthesis in comparative studies (n = 5)
N | EOA cm2 | Peak Gradient mmHg | Mean Gradient mmHg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bernard 2023 [32] | ||||
Inspiris Resilia | 25 | NA | NA | 11.4 ± 3.6 |
Magna Ease | 25 | NA | NA | 17.3 ± 6.6 |
Chiariello 2023 [35] | ||||
Inspiris Resilia | 73 | 1.5 (1.3–1.7) | 21 (16–26) | 12 (10–15) |
Avalus | 72 | 1.4 (1.2–1.5) | 23 (15–28) | 13 (8–17) |
Francica 2023 [40] | ||||
Inspiris Resilia | NA | 22.7 ± 9.1 | 12.6 ± 5.5 | |
Magna Ease | NA | 22.8 ± 14.2 | 12.5 ± 8.8 | |
Maeda 2023 [34] | ||||
Inspiris Resilia | 64 | 1.69 ± 0.34 | NA | 10.7 ± 5.1 |
Magna Ease | 64 | 1.51 ± 0.30 | NA | 9.7 ± 4.5 |
Shala 2022 [33] | ||||
Inspiris Resilia | 48 | NA | NA | 9 [11 − 7] |
Magna Ease | 56 | NA | NA | 12 [15 − 9] |