Skip to main content

Table 6 Positive and negative aspects of diagnostic modalities for PE

From: Incidence of secondary pericardial effusions associated with different etiologies: a comprehensive review of literature

Imaging modality

Main indications and advantages

Main disadvantages

Echocardiography

First and most common diagnostic method due to:

Availability,

Safety,

low cost,

applicability at the bedside

Widely used for follow-up of PE

Not well-performed in tissue characterization

Dependent on the skills of the operator

Restricted ability in cases of obesity, obstructive lung diseases, and after cardiothoracic surgery

Limited window and narrow field of view

CT scan

Better anatomical visualization compared to echocardiography

Suitable in cases of the possibility of the presence of pathology in adjacent tissues or organs, such as cancers

Used for the planning before cardiothoracic surgeries

High performance in the detection of pericardial calcifications

Use ionizing radiation or contrast (in cases needing anatomical evaluation). Therefore, it is mostly possible for retrospective gated studies

It is only practical in hemodynamically stable patients and those who can hold their breaths

The temporal resolution is limited

MRI

It is mostly used for better anatomical evaluation and characterization

Specific features are required, such as hemodynamic stability, being able to hold breaths, and GFR ≥ 30 in cases of Gadolinium-contrast need

Not possible in some cases with metal devices in the thorax, such as some pacemakers or defibrillators

Not capable of visualizing lung tissue or calcification with an appropriate sensitivity and quality

High cost and lower availability