- Case Report
- Open access
- Published:
Type a aortic dissection after aortic wrapping performed 26 years ago: a case report
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 19, Article number: 563 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Aortic wrapping (AW) has been performed as a less invasive alternative to aortoplasty. However, AW can also cause long-term aortic complications. In this report, we present a rare case of a dissecting aortic aneurysm between the proximal side of the wrap and the sinotubular junction after AW.
Case presentation
A female patient had undergone urgent aortic valve replacement with a 19-mm mechanical valve to treat infective endocarditis and AW to treat an enlarged ascending aorta 26 years prior. At the age of 71 years, the patient was diagnosed with a dissecting aortic aneurysm between the proximal side of the wrap and the sinotubular junction. We performed graft replacement of the ascending aorta, including complete resection of the wrap. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 10, and there have been no cardiovascular events during her ongoing follow up.
Conclusions
AW in younger patients can lead to late aortic complications. Careful consideration should be paid when performing AW in young patients, and patients who have previously undergone AW require strict life-long follow-up.
Background
Aortic wrapping (AW) was first reported in 1956 and has been performed as a less invasive alternative to aortoplasty [1]. Even in acute type A aortic dissection, for which graft replacement is the gold standard, a recent study reported on the efficacy of AW [2]. However, AW can also cause long-term aortic complications [3]. Here, we report a rare case of a dissecting aortic aneurysm (DAA) between the proximal side of the wrap and the sinotubular junction (STJ) after AW.
Case presentation
A 71-year-old woman had undergone urgent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a 19-mm mechanical valve to treat infective endocarditis 26 years prior. She also had undergone AW just distal to the STJ using PTFE felt because she had a bicuspid aortic valve and enlarged ascending aorta. An outpatient echocardiography revealed an elevated aortic valve pressure gradient (mean pressure gradient: 32.2 mmHg) caused by pannus formation and enlargement of the ascending aorta incidentally. Computed tomography (CT) revealed distal migration of the wrap and DAA, with a maximum minor-axis diameter of 57 mm between the proximal side of the wrap and the STJ (Fig. 1). We therefore scheduled re-AVR and graft replacement of the ascending aorta. An additional movie file shows the full surgical details (see Additional file 1). Following successful re-sternotomy without injury, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established via cannulation of the femoral artery and right atrium. The wrap had firmly adhered to the surrounding tissues. While the patient was cooled to 20 °C, careful resection was performed between the wrap and surrounding structures. Over 35 min of hypothermic circulatory arrest, the wrapped aorta (Fig. 2a) was completely resected, and distal anastomosis was performed between the 26-mm artificial vascular graft and the aortic hemiarch. On the distal side, felt strips that had been used to stop bleeding had eroded into the aorta (Fig. 2a). An intimal tear was observed between the proximal side of the wrap and the STJ. The ascending aorta, including the intimal tear, was resected. After the mechanical valve was removed, the pannus was dissected, and the annulus of the non-coronary cusp was reconstructed using bovine pericardium to repair damage from the previous surgery. Re-AVR was performed using a 19-mm bioprosthesis. Once proximal anastomosis was completed, the patient was successfully weaned from CPB. Postoperative CT revealed no aortic complications (Fig. 2b). The patient was discharged on postoperative day 10 and is currently undergoing follow-up as an outpatient; no cardiovascular events have so far been detected.
Discussion and conclusions
In this case, a late aortic complication occurred in a wrapped aorta; however, 26 years post-procedure, no dilation of the wrapped segment was observed, in contrast to the non-wrapped segment. Some reports of AW for a dilated ascending aorta with relatively good clinical results have been noted [4, 5]; moreover, this case does not report a poor outcome as no dilation of the wrapped segment has been observed for 26 years. We report a rare case of late aortic complications following AW, wherein localized DAA occurred between the proximal side of the wrap and the STJ. AW can have various biomechanical effects on the aorta. It may promote intimal hyperplasia and increase wall stress in nearby sections or cause structural and histological changes because the persistent pressure of the external prosthesis on the aorta induces vasa vasorum dysfunction and chronic inflammation [3]. In this case, biomechanical, structural, and histological changes caused by AW may have caused distal migration of the external prosthesis and tearing of the native aorta. The fact that her valve was bicuspid may also have affected the aorta. Few reports in the literature discuss reoperations after AW. Ehrich et al. performed a Bentall procedure with complete resection of a wrapped aorta to enlarge the sinus of Valsalva after AW [6]. When reoperations are needed after AW, the wrapped aorta should be removed as completely as possible to avoid late complications. However, complete resection can be difficult if the wrapped aorta tightly adheres to the surrounding tissues. Adhesion between the pulmonary artery and external prosthesis is often particularly strong. In our case, the wrapped aorta was peeled off from the pulmonary artery without injury because aortic pressure was decreased via cross-clamping and circulatory arrest. The peeling very close to the aorta, which was reinforced with the external prosthesis, may have prevented damage. However, careful consideration should be paid when performing AW in young patients because reoperations to treat distal late aortic complications are difficult. If any young patients undergo AW, strict life-long follow-up is required.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- AVR:
-
Aortic valve replacement
- AW:
-
Aortic wrapping
- CPB:
-
Cardiopulmonary bypass
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- DAA:
-
Dissecting aortic aneurysm
- STJ:
-
Sinotubular junction
References
Bahson HT, Nelson AR. Cystic medial necrosis as a cause of localized aortic aneurysms amenable to surgical treatment. Ann Surg. 1956;144:519–29.
Vento V, Multon S, Ramadan R, Deleuze P, Fabre D, Guihaire J, et al. Outcomes of urgent aortic wrapping for acute type a aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164:1412–20.
González-Santos JM, Arnáiz-GarcÃa ME. Wrapping of the ascending aorta revisited-is there any role left for conservative treatment of ascending aortic aneurysm? J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:S488–97.
Laux ML, Ostovar R, Braun C, Hartrumpf M, Claus T, Schröter F, et al. Wrapping in ascending aortic aneurysms as an alternative for replacement: is it beneficial? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68:322–7.
Choi MS, Jeong DS, Lee HY, Sung K, Kim WS, Lee YT, et al. Aortic wrapping for a dilated ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic stenosis. Circ J. 2015;79:778–84.
Ehrich T, Federspiel JM, Bohle RM, Schäfers HJ. Severe aortic wall degeneration after aortic wrapping. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60:425–7.
Acknowledgements
None declared.
Funding
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TN collected the data and described and designed the manuscript. The other co-authors discussed the contents of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by Kansai Rosai Hospital Ethics Committee. IRB number: 23C067g (18 October 2023). Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Consent for publication
The patient consented to the publication of this report.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1 : Details of repeat aortic valve replacement and graft replacement of the ascending aorta after aortic wrapping. Aortic cross-clamping and circulatory arrest facilitated complete resection of the wrapped aorta without injury to the pulmonary artery
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nakazato, T., Ozaki, T. & Kitahara, M. Type a aortic dissection after aortic wrapping performed 26 years ago: a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 563 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13019-024-03076-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13019-024-03076-0