Skip to main content

Heparin rebound in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a single-center retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Heparin, an anticoagulant used in cardiac surgery, can result in heparin rebound (HR), where it returns postoperatively despite being neutralized with protamine. This study was designed to investigate the prevalence of HR in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) and evaluate the impact of HR on their short-term outcomes.

Methods

HR was defined by a 10% increase in activated coagulation time (ACT) following two hours of heparin neutralization with protamine, bleeding over 200 mL/h, and abnormal laboratory coagulation examination results. We analyzed 503 OPCAB patients aged 31–80 years from September 2019 to June 2022, who were categorized into HR (n = 56) and Non-HR (n = 447) groups. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding volume. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative reoperation for bleeding, allogenic blood transfusion incidences and volumes, and laboratory variables.

Results

Significant differences were observed in preoperative platelet counts (P < 0.001) and the ACT measured 2 h post-heparin neutralization (P = 0.012). The group HR exhibited higher 24-hour bleeding volumes, increased reoperation rates, and greater total bleeding volumes (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Postoperative HR was found to be prevalent in OPCAB patients and increased bleeding risks. These findings indicate the need for future randomized controlled trials to confirm the impact of HR and guide patient blood management.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Heparin Rebound (HR) is a phenomenon where heparin’s anticoagulant effects re-emerge postoperatively after being neutralized with protamine during cardiac surgery [1]. HR may lead to increased bleeding following surgery, and in cases where prolonged coagulation times and/or continued bleeding are observed, additional doses of protamine may be required. Various definitions of HR can be found in the literature. For example, some groups considered a prolonged coagulation-based laboratory test, such as the activated coagulation time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), or international normalized ratio (INR), as an indicator of HR [2,3,4,5,6]. In addition, some groups suggested both increased bleeding (at a rate of more than 200 mL/h) and abnormal laboratory test results for a diagnosis of HR [7]. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is widely recognized as a safe procedure for treating ischemic heart disease. Numerous research studies have consistently demonstrated that OPCAB results in fewer complications compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) [8, 9]. However, the authors’ conclusions do not adequately consider the multifactorial complexity of postoperative bleeding. While the authors do acknowledge the potential occurrence of the HR phenomenon, which may contribute to abnormal bleeding, further exploration of this topic is necessary.

Therefore, additional research is needed to confirm these findings. Consequently, the present study aims to investigate the specific characteristics of HR associated with OPCAB.

Methods

Study design and population

Informed consent was not requested as this study is a retrospective chart review. The study did not involve the identification of patients’ personal information. Consecutive patients who underwent primary and isolated OPCAB at a large-volume cardiovascular center between September 2019 and June 2022 were screened for eligibility. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) adult patients (> 18 years old); (2) patients undergoing OPCAB; (3) normal preoperative coagulation function. Exclusion criteria include: (1) taking anticoagulant drugs; (2) emergency OPCAB; (3) patients with missing or incomplete outcomes of interest; (4) prior cardiac surgery.

Anesthetic and surgical protocol

Chronic cardiac medications, such as anti-hypertensive and anti-anginal agents, were continued up to the morning of surgery. Anti-platelet and anticoagulation medications were discontinued 8 days before surgery. No anesthetic premedication was given. For anesthesia induction, etomidate was administered at a dose of 2 mg kg − 1, sufentanil at a dose of 2–3 µg kg − 1, and cis-atracurium at a dose of 0.15–0.2 mg kg − 1. For anesthesia maintenance, propofol was administered at a rate of 100–200 mg h − 1, dexmedetomidine at a rate of 30–50 µg h − 1, cis-atracurium at a rate of 10–20 mg h − 1, and sevoflurane at a concentration of 0.5-2.5%. No included patient in the current study received epidural anesthesia, spinal morphine, or erector spinae block. Aspirin alone or in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) was administered orally after the removal of the chest drainage tube in the postoperative period, as determined by the surgeons.

During the coronary graft procedure, all subjects underwent a sternotomy at the median, where the left internal thoracic artery and/or great saphenous veins were extracted. To ensure adequate clot formation, a heparin (Shanghai First Biochemical Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China, 2 ml: 12,500 u) dosage of 200 IU/kg was administered, which led to an ACT exceeding 300 s. Towards the end of the revascularization process, protamine (Beijing YueKang Kaiyue Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China, 5 ml: 50 mg), was used to counteract the effects of heparin at a ratio ranging from 0.8 to 1. Additional protamine sulfate was administered based on the ACT ( Medtronic ACT II analyzer, Medtronic Inc., USA). Additionally, all study participants received intraoperative autologous blood retrieval using cell saver systems.

Criteria for allogeneic transfusion and reoperation

Postoperative blood loss was assessed by measuring the total amount of fluid collected from the chest drainage tube starting from the end of the surgery until its removal. In order to determine the need for blood transfusion, A large-volume cardiovascular center Hospital followed a specific transfusion protocol. For example, if the hemoglobin level dropped below 8.0 g dl− 1, a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was initiated. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) infusion was administered in cases of diffuse bleeding with prothrombin time 1.5 times longer than the baseline value. Platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion was deemed necessary if the platelet count fell below 50 × 109/l or in instances of platelet (PLT) dysfunction. Reoperation was carried out if the volume of fluid collected from the chest tube exceeded 300 ml h− 1 within the first 2 h or 200 ml h− 1 for 4 h. The chest drainage tube was only removed when the rate of fluid discharge was less than 20 ml for a duration of 5 to 6 h.

Data collection

This gathered information encompasses baseline characteristics comprising age, weight, and height, along with coagulation-related laboratory tests, such as ACT, APTT, PT, PLT count, INR, and heparin sensitivity index (HSI), HSI=(ACT after initial heparin administration – ACT baseline)/initial heparin dose (seconds/(IU/kg)).

Data were gathered from hospital electronic medical records, encompassing laboratory test outcomes, perioperative status, and postoperative recuperation. Subsequent to the surgical procedure, the patient was moved to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), where the nurse recorded the length of mechanical ventilation, chest tube drainage, and postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion.

Statistical analysis

For continuous variables with non-normalization distribution, median [IQR (lower quartile, upper quartile)] was presented. For continuous variables with normalization distribution, mean (SD) was presented. The normality of quantitative data was examined by the Shapiro–Wilk test. For comparison between groups, continuous and categorical variables were tested by t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test and Pearson’s χ2 or Fisher’s exact test, respectively. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Missing data were treated as missing and omitted from analysis, and no replacement was applied. All statistics were performed using SPSS (version 27.0.1).

Results

The patient selection process is shown in Fig. 1. Totally, 503 patients were finally included and divided into group HR (n = 56) and group Non-HR (n = 447).

Patient characteristics, preoperative and intraoperative data of the study population were summarized in Tables 1 and 2. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics such as gender, age, body weight, body mass index, smoking, and drinking habits, or blood types between the HR and Non-HR groups. No important differences in patient characteristics and intraoperative volume balance were found between the HR and Non-HR groups. There was no significant difference in preoperative APTT, PLT count, PT, INR, and HSI.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Enrollment flowchart

Table 1 Preoperative variables
Table 2 Intraoperative variables

Postoperative variables of included patients were summarized in Table 3. At univariate analysis, there was difference with respect to preoperative PLT count (132.5(108.5-167.8))109/l vs. (164.0(128.3–195.0))109/l, P < 0.001. However, after full antagonism of protamine, during the ACT of 2 h post-heparin neutralization, a significant difference was identified between the two groups, and there was no notable difference in the total amount of protamine administered. There was a significant difference in the 24-hour bleeding volume (P = 0.000) and total bleeding volume (P < 0.001), revealing statistical significance between the two groups.

Table 3 Postoperative variables

Postoperative outcomes were summarized in Table 4. There was a significant difference in reoperation for bleeding (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay, or hospital length of stay between the groups.

Table 4 Postoperative outcomes

Discussion

Our investigation aimed to explore heparin rebound (HR) in patients undergoing OPCAB, with a focus on the premature elimination of protamine and its implications for coagulation time and bleeding [10]. In a study conducted by Gravlee and colleagues, an analysis was carried out on variations in the levels of ACT in patients undergoing cardiac surgery at different time points [11]. Our findings, in accordance with previous research, identify HR as a contributing factor to postoperative bleeding following cardiac surgery [12]. Notably, the significant difference in ACT values 2 h post-neutralization between groups emphasizes the necessity of comprehending the temporal dynamics of HR in OPCAB [13]. This understanding is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing bleeding complications. We suggest increasing the protamine dosage to minimize the incidence of HR, acknowledging that factors other than HR, such as thrombocytopenia and coagulation factor insufficiency, may elevate ACT [14]. The anticoagulant mechanism of heparin involves binding with Antithrombin III (AT-III), forming a complex that deactivates thrombin on the platelet membrane [15,16,17,18]. The efficacy of heparin depends on AT-III, highlighting its role in HR management [19]. Our study reveals postoperative platelet count differences, suggesting that monitoring coagulation function can preliminarily indicate the occurrence of HR. Increasing the protamine dosage can reduce 24-hour postoperative bleeding [20]. The sensitivity of APTT to coagulation factor deficiency and heparin indicates that 82% of samples show factor deficiencies or other inhibitors, rather than being related to heparin [20]. An increase in PT-INR occurs with defects in factors II, VII, and X, but normal PT-INR requires sufficient levels of factors V, thrombin, and fibrin. Thus, PT-INR alone is not suitable for detecting heparin activity. Carr et al. found that reversing heparin-induced platelet dysfunction requires a higher protamine dose than normalizing APTT, suggesting that the antiplatelet effect of high-dose heparin may persist despite APTT correction [21]. The influence of heparin rebound on postoperative bleeding seems to be negligible, but might get significant in conjunction with incomplete heparin reversal or other coagulopathies [22]. Therefore, it may be useful to obtain images of the complete coagulation spectrum after cardiac surgery, which could be achieved by a combination of viscoelastic and aggregation testing [22].

There were some limitations worth to be mentioned. Firstly, it was a single-center retrospective study which might have patient selection bias. Secondly, although we estimated the sample size, it might still be insufficient due to heterogeneity resulted from different anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patients. Future research should concentrate on predictive models for HR and personalized anticoagulation techniques, as well as the influence of protamine administration schedules on HR and the role of novel anticoagulants in cardiac surgery.

Conclusions

HR and incomplete heparin reversal are commonly observed after cardiac surgery with OPCAB, and these phenomena may contribute to an increased risk of postoperative bleeding. To mitigate this risk, it is important to predict the likelihood of heparin rebound in patients by monitoring postoperative platelet count and the ACT values measured 2 h after the administration of the neutralized dose. By implementing appropriate measures, such as timely intervention, it is possible to prevent postoperative bleeding and the need for reoperation due to bleeding.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ACT:

Activated coagulation time

APTT:

Activated partial thromboplastin time

AT-III:

Antithrombin III

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

CPB:

Cardiopulmonary bypass

FFP:

Fresh frozen plasma

HR:

Heparin rebound

HSI:

Heparin sensitivity index

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

INR:

International normalized ratio

OPCAB:

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

PLT:

Platelet

PT:

Prothrombin time

PC:

Platelet concentrate

RBC:

Red blood cell

References

  1. Stone ME, Vespe MW. Heparin rebound: an In-Depth review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023;37(4):601–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gravlee GP, Rogers AT, Dudas LM, Taylor R, Roy RC, Case LD, Triscott M, Brown CW, Mark LJ, Cordell AR. Heparin management protocol for cardiopulmonary bypass influences postoperative heparin rebound but not bleeding. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(3):393–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Subramaniam P, Skillington P, Tatoulis J. Heparin-rebound in the early postoperative phase following cardiopulmonary bypass. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(5):331–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gollub S. Heparin rebound in open heart surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967;124(2):337–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellison N, Beatty CP, Blake DR, Wurzel HA, MacVaugh H 3rd. Heparin rebound. Studies in patients and volunteers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1974;67(5):723–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mammen EF, Koets MH, Washington BC, Wolk LW, Brown JM, Burdick M, Selik NR, Wilson RF. Hemostasis changes during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1985;11(3):281–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuitunen AH, Salmenperä MT, Heinonen J, Rasi VP, Myllylä G. Heparin rebound: a comparative study of protamine chloride and protamine sulfate in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1991;5(3):221–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bachmann F, McKenna R, Cole ER, Najafi H. The hemostatic mechanism after open-heart surgery. I. studies on plasma coagulation factors and fibrinolysis in 512 patients after extracorporeal circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70(1):76–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang C, Jiang Y, Song Y, Wang Q, Tian R, Wang D, Dong N, Jiang X, Chen S, Chen X. Off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass at 30 days: a propensity matched analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:965648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Effler DB, Groves LK, Kolff WJ, Sones FM Jr. Disposable membrane oxygenator (heart-lung machine) and its use in experimental surgery. J Thorac Surg. 1956;32(5):620–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gravlee GP, Arora S, Lavender SW, Mills SA, Hudspeth AS, Cordell AR, James RL, Brockschmidt JK, Stuart JJ. Predictive value of blood clotting tests in cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58(1):216–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galeone A, Rotunno C, Guida P, Bisceglie A, Rubino G, Schinosa Lde L, Paparella D. Monitoring incomplete heparin reversal and heparin rebound after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(5):853–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gravlee GP, Case LD, Angert KC, et al. Variability of the activated coagulation time. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:469–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mochizuki T, Olson PJ, Szlam F, Ramsay JG, Levy JH. Protamine reversal of heparin affects platelet aggregation and activated clotting time after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(4):781–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gindele R, Pénzes-Daku K, Balogh G, Kállai J, Bogáti R, Bécsi B, Erdődi F, Katona É, Bereczky Z. Investigation of the differences in Antithrombin to Heparin Binding among Antithrombin Budapest 3, Basel, and Padua mutations by biochemical and in Silico methods. Biomolecules. 2021;11(4):544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hashimoto K, Yamagishi M, Sasaki T, Nakano M, Kurosawa H. Heparin and antithrombin III levels during cardiopulmonary bypass: correlation with subclinical plasma coagulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58(3):799–804. discussion 804-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Zhao J, Yu Y, Liu X, Lin L, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ. Antithrombin III-Binding site analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin fractions. J Pharm Sci. 2018;107(5):1290–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu X, Lei T, Li SJ, Liu YF, Peng J, Ning JP. Construction of novel antiplatelet modified polyethersulfone membrane and study into its blood compatibility. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2022;135:112659.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guan Y, Xu X, Liu X, Sheng A, Jin L, Linhardt RJ, Chi L. Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparins prepared from bovine lung heparin and Porcine Intestine Heparin. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(6):1843–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray DJ, Brosnahan WJ, Pennell B, Kapalanski D, Weiler JM, Olson J. Heparin detection by the activated coagulation time: a comparison of the sensitivity of coagulation tests and heparin assays. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11(1):24–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carr ME Jr, Carr SL. At high heparin concentrations, protamine concentrations which reverse heparin anticoagulant effects are insufficient to reverse heparin anti-platelet effects. Thromb Res. 1994;75(6):617–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rijpkema M, Vlot EA, Stehouwer MC, Bruins P. Does heparin rebound lead to postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass? Perfusion. 2024;39(8):1491–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all colleagues and patients involved in the current study.

Funding

This work was partially funded by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS)-2021-I2M-C&T-B-038.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

YT-y. and YX. Conceptualization, methodology, project administration, resource allocation, supervision, visualization, and writing—review and editing. FJ. Data curation. YX, SS-h, and JQ-w. Formal analysis: YX. Funding acquisition: FJ, YX, and YT-y. Investigation, validation, and writing of the original draft: YX. Software development: YX. All authors have contributed to the article and approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-tai Yao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by our institutional review board (Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences), which waived the requirement for individual patient consent because only routine patient data were used for this retrospective analysis. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, F., Xu, Y., Hu, Ss. et al. Heparin rebound in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a single-center retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg 20, 18 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13019-024-03267-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13019-024-03267-9

Keywords