Skip to main content

Utilization of ultrasonic aspirator for combined aortic and mitral valve decalcification: a case study

Abstract

Mitral and aortic annular calcification is an age-related degenerative process that can result in severe mitral and/or aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation. Annular calcification not only increases the surgical complexity but also increases the risk of complications. In this case report, we present the innovative use of the Sonopet ultrasonic surgical aspirator for aortic and mitral annular decalcification in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, mild aortic stenosis and moderate mitral regurgitation in the presence of mitral annular calcification (MAC) and aorto-mitral curtain calcification.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The ultrasonic aspirator, a device capable of fragmenting tissue via ultrasonic waves without damaging adjacent structures, was originally developed for neurosurgical procedures. this device by high-frequency vibration breaks up the brittle calcium without damaging the underlying soft tissue as confirmed by the histopathological examination of the excised valves [1, 2]. Simultaneous feeding of the aerosolized water prevents the damage to the adjacent tissues due to the heat generated by the device. Although, in recent years, ultrasonic devices have made some strides in the successful decalcification of the mitral and aortic annulus in patients with mitral annular calcification (MAC) and Aortic stenosis (AS) [3, 4], their application in cardiac surgery still remains underutilized. We herein report the use of Sonopet ultrasonic device for the simultaneous decalcification of the MAC and aorto-mitral curtain in a patient undergoing surgical septal myectomy, aortic valve repair and mitral valve replacement (MVR).

Case

A 75-year-old lady with history of hypertension, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction, S/P percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), presented with progressive fatigue and exertional dyspnea for one year. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed restricted left coronary cusp with mild AS with mild AR, and moderate MR with mild mitral stenosis in the setting of severe MAC. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter was 60 mm, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56%. Coronaries were normal on coronary angiography. Non-contrast computed tomography of the chest also confirmed severe MAC.

Operative technique

Surgery was performed on mild hypothermic cardioplegic arrest. Aortotomy was performed to access the aortic valve. Left aortic cusp was frozen due to calcified fibrous trigone. Initially, we performed the septal myectomy using a PlasmaBlade [5]. Subsequently, calcium from the fibrous trigone under the left aortic cusp was debrided using Sonopet ultrasonic aspirator (Stryker(®), Kalamazoo, MI, USA). Decalcification significantly improved the mobility and coaptation of the aortic cusps. Subsequently, aortotomy was closed in two layers and the mitral valve was approached through a trans-septal approach. Mitral valve was inspected but deemed unsuitable for repair; hence, the mitral valve leaflets were excised. There was extensive MAC along the posterior mitral annulus (Fig. 1). We debrided calcium from the mitral annulus using Sonopet ultrasonic aspirator with regular assessment of the mitral annulus (Video 1). Our aim was to achieve enough suppleness of the posterior mitral annulus to safely pass the needle for pledgeted sutures. Subsequently, 27 mm Epic bioprosthetic mitral valve (St. Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, MN, USA) was sutured. Subsequently, the inter-atrial septum and right atriotomy were repaired, and the aortic cross-clamp was removed. Patient was weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass on minimal inotropes. Transoesophageal echocardiography demonstrated well-functioning mitral bioprosthesis without paravalvular leak. Native aortic valve was also functioning well with minimal AR. Her postoperative course was uneventful, and patient was discharged on postoperative day 5. At last follow-up 1 year after surgery, patient remained asymptomatic with a well-functioning aortic valve and mitral prosthesis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Intraoperative photograph showing severe mitral annular calcification along the posterior annulus

Discussion

Mitral or aortic valve repair, whenever feasible, is preferred over replacement regardless of LV function and concurrent cardiac operations [2]. However, associated annular calcification makes the valve repair as well as replacement challenging. Aortic and mitral annular calcification, and aorto-mitral curtain calcification is an age-related degenerative process of the fibrous skeleton of the heart [6]. During MVR, MAC has been linked with the poor outcomes and increased mortality due to paravalvular leak, heart block, calcium embolization, stroke, left atrioventricular groove disruption due to overzealous mitral annular calcium debridement, and myocardial infarction due to the left circumflex coronary artery injury [1, 7].

Mechanical debridement of MAC results in improved mobility of mitral leaflets and annular pliability for the suture placement. Conventionally, mitral annular calcium is removed mechanically using pituitary rongeurs. However, in the presence of extensive annular calcification, mechanical debridement may result in significant loss of annular tissue, injury to adjacent myocardium, and the risk of annular disruption [8]. Similarly, mechanical debridement of the aortic valve has been described for calcific AS; however, recurrences of AS and the development of aortic regurgitation (AR) led to the abandonment of this practice [3].

The use of the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) was first described by Hodgson et al. in 1979 [9]. all ultrasonic devices focus low-frequency ultrasound vibrations on the calcium specks, creating very small fragments that are aspirated while protecting surrounding soft tissue. Therefore, it helps in safe and effective debridement of MAC and aorto-mitral curtain calcification without disrupting the annular integrity. There are reports of using CUSA [6] and Sonopet Ultrasonic surgical aspirator for severe MAC during MVR for MS [4]. Brescia et al. [4]. conducted a retrospective comparative analysis focusing on patients operated for mitral valve disease and had MAC. The study observed no perioperative mortality or stroke in the Sonopet group (N = 15) compared to 10% (17/164) incidence of mortality (P = 0.37) and 7% (12/164) incidence of stroke (P = 0.60) in the non-Sonopet group. The difference however was not statistically significant. Among the 17 mortalities in the non-Sonopet group, AV groove dehiscence or rupture, multisystem organ failure, right heart and respiratory failure, massive stroke leading to uncal herniation, hemorrhage with ventricular fibrillation arrest, and aspiration with pneumonia were cited as the primary cause. Median length of hospital stays, mean mitral prosthetic gradient, and rate of reoperation (Sonopet group (7%) and non-Sonopet group (5%); P = 0.55) was not significantly different between the groups. Only one patient in the Sonopet group had mild MR, and no patients exhibited moderate or severe MR.

Ours is the first reported case of Sonopet use for both aortic fibrous trigone and posterior mitral annular calcium debridement. We believe that the use of Sonopet in cardiac surgery is significantly underutilized. In two other reports published from our institute, we successfully used the Sonopet ultrasonic surgical aspirator for pericardial cyst decalcification in a patient undergoing excision of calcified pericardial cyst [10] and difficult insertion of HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in a patient with severely calcified left ventricular apex [11]. The above-stated experience clearly demonstrates that Sonopet ultrasonic surgical aspirator can be safely used in cardiac surgery in various locations to decalcify while preserving the native cardiac tissue. Additional studies are warranted to further define role Sonopet for cardiac decalcification at various locations and its impact on the outcomes of cardiac surgery.

Conclusion

Sonopet ultrasonic surgical aspirator is a safe and effective tool in debriding annular calcium and preserving adjoining cardiac tissue in patients with calcified aortic and/or mitral annular calcification.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AR:

Aortic regurgitation

AS:

Aortic stenosis

CUSA:

Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator

MAC:

Mitral annular calcification

MR:

Mitral regurgitation

MVR:

Mitral valve replacement

References

  1. Kellner HJ, Pracki P, Hildebrandt A, Binner C, Eisele G, Struck E. Aortic valve debridement by ultrasonic surgical aspirator in degenerative, aortic valve stenosis: follow-up with Doppler echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(7):498–504. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s1010-7940(96)80414-3. PMID: 8855420.

  2. Baumgartner FJ, Pandya A, Omari BO, Pandya A, Turner C, Milliken JC, Robertson JM. Ultrasonic debridement of mitral calcification. J Card Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):240-2. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1997.tb00133.x. PMID: 9591178.

  3. Brescia AA, Rosenbloom LM, Watt TMF, Bergquist CS, Williams AM, Murray SL, Markey GE, Pagani FD, Ailawadi G, Bolling SF, Romano MA, Michigan Mitral Research Group. Ultrasonic Emulsification of Severe Mitral Annular Calcification During Mitral Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;113(6):2092–2096. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.066. Epub 2022 Jan 3. PMID: 34990573.

  4. Kaneko T, Hirji S, Percy E, et al. Characterizing risks Associated with mitral annular calcification in mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(6):1761–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alomari M, Garg P, Wadiwala I, Pham SM, Sareyyupoglu B. Septal myectomy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy using a pulsed radiofrequency energy soft tissue dissection instrument. JTCVS Tech. 2023;22:220–2. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.07.015. PMID: 38152217; PMCID: PMC10750430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Feindel CM, Tufail Z, David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S. Mitral valve surgery in patients with extensive calcification of the mitral annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(3):777–82. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00081-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rimmer L, Ahmad MU, Chaplin G, Joshi M, Harky A. Aortic Valve Repair: Where Are We Now? Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(7):988–999. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Mar 4. Erratum in: Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(11):e151. PMID: 30871890.

  8. Passik CS, Douglas M, Ackermann JR, Pluth. and William D. Edwards. Temporal changes in the causes of aortic stenosis: a surgical pathologic study of 646 cases. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Elsevier, 1987;62(2):119–123.

  9. Williams JW, Hodgson WJ. Histologic evaluation of tissues sectioned by ultrasonically powered instruments (a preliminary report). Mt Sinai J Med. 1979;46(2):105–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lykins AJ, Garg P, Fleissner ZJ, Sareyyupoglu B. Successful management of complex haemorrhagic pericardial cyst with cirrhosis of liver: a case report. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(6):ivac278. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/icvts/ivac278. PMID: 36409034; PMCID: PMC9707403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan FW, Pham V, Garg P, Hussain MWA, Pham SM. A novel technique for insertion of left ventricular assist device in a patient with severely calcified left ventricle apex. JTCVS Tech. 2023;19:61–3. PMID: 37324359; PMCID: PMC10267860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MA: writing original draft, writing review and editing. BP: writing original draft, writing review and editing. PG: writing original draft, writing review and editing. SN: writing original draft, writing review and editing. NBC: writing original draft, writing review and editing. BS: writing original draft, writing review and editing, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basar Sareyyupoglu.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have nothing to disclose regarding commercial support.

Permission

The patient signed a written informed consent regarding publication of this material inclining video and images.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: Video 1. Intraoperative short clip, highlighting the posterior mitral annular decalcification using Sonopet ultrasonic machine.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alomari, M., Paciotti, B., Garg, P. et al. Utilization of ultrasonic aspirator for combined aortic and mitral valve decalcification: a case study. J Cardiothorac Surg 20, 82 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13019-024-03324-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13019-024-03324-3

Keywords